old news I know, but Bloodhound gang is really artistically brilliant. Most of their music videos are pure satire and it jsut makes me happy. Their music is incredibly catchy and their ability to hire very attractive women for these video’s is PRIMO.

anyways this is a pretty short post because I just wanted to share this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOEso6uxgcA

this video is making fun of those “romantic” boy band songs

Let’s consider the similarities.

Lucas has many good stories in his head that I would like to listen to and talk about. So does M. Night.

Lucas became very impressed with his own brilliance and somehow thought that because he wrote one good script, that he could write many good scripts. M. Night could use someone else writing his ideas down.

Lucas can create drama, but he can’t create realistic relationships. M. Night’s stilted relationships hurt his films. When the relationship is parent-child, he seems fine, but love. Gracious! The Village and The Happening being our best examples.

Lucas had a cult following. M. Night has his cult of people too.

Lucas was better off when his movies were cheaper and not all CGI crap. M. Night could use someone telling him that he doesn’t HAVE to spend $80 million to make a good movie, especially one that should be focused on the people, not the external action.

Lucas is not a great director. M. Night… well, he has a good eye, but he doesn’t get the best performances out of his actors, maybe because he gives them bad direction.

Lucas’ movies that are directed by others are better than those he directed. A New Hope is a classic, but from Empire Strike Back to the original Indiana Jones movies he had other people making great works. Then he directed the second Star Wars trilogy. I rest my case.

Would M. Night benefit from somebody else working with him, like a Rian Johnson or Spike Jonze who would have a different view on things? Yes, I believe he would.

M. Night Shyamalan still can make great films, but he’s got to let other smart people help him. Forget the studios, but he’s got the ideas. He needs the direction.

In the wake of the loss of Tim Russert, I would like to be considered a potential replacement. I am not quite as jolly as him, but I am also not nearly as imbecilic as his cohorts. (a terrorist fist jab?)

I may be a bit young, but the quest has now begun in earnest for a job in DC. Journalism? Capitol Hill? Both are appealing, but it seems fully plausible that I will end up with neither, doing PR, another job type that interests me.

Looking for a job is, for my point of view, pure Hell. You spend months writing, calling and altogether pimping yourself out, most of the time without even a recognition of your existence from an employer.

“One day they’re going to regret this,” you say. But maybe they’re just beating you down. Beating and beating and beating till you give up on your quest to show them. You decide “well, this is good enough.” Eventually all your jobs are just “good enough.” Eventually, you have no such thing as ambition. This process moves quickly for some people. Some people never learn. Those people run the world.

But that meantime, fighting for motivation, trying not to get discouraged and somehow convince yourself that editing this cover letter is worth it, that the marginal benefit of the effort exists. I don’t just want a job. I want a job I like. The battle has begun between me and the world of people hiring. I’m no quitter.

I have always ALWAYS been a fan of free thought, its what the education system used to be based off of. Dreams are awesome in the thought that they are our minds images while thinking freely. Granted since our thoughts are so opressed by Standards of learning we dont get to express our thoughts as much as we should. Sometimes thoughts are expressed too freely and then looked upon as crazy and strange. OF COURSE THEY’RE STRANGE! each one of us is screwy in the head.

When has someone not had a dream about something ridiculously funny and then turned around and said “Hey, I had the weirdest dream last night.” only to receive a look of criticism in return. Free thought these days is thought to be Immature and well, crazy. Ellen DeGeneres once said “We dont play with our inner child anymore!” she couldnt be further than the truth. Some of you may be sitting there staring atyour monitor possibly glancing at a piece of paper on your desk thinking “what if I just balled it up and threw it? would someone throw it back? will I start the first intercubiclegame of catch?” . To that I say go for it! Who cares as long as you don’t hit one of your 4 bosses you’re golden, and if the person who gets hit by the ball looks at you and says “did you throw this” you say HELL YEAH I DID now go long! Chances are they will accept your invitation to Recreational office shenanigans and toss it back.

more on this when I remember what my original point was

This is a question oft asked of me when I have the opportunity to present my research in Gnarples. The problem is that I truly have no precise answer. That is not to say that there is not answer, indeed, the truth is quite the opposite. There are many answers, none more correct than the next.

To clarify, Gnarpology is what I do. I study the gnarple. Gnarplism is more esoteric. It tries to apply the role of gnarples to the context of every day lives. I am wary of calling it a form of religion, or even a belief structure. I can outline how it works, but sociologist and colleague Dr. Whitney Richardson is the expert.

The most common form of Gnarplism is the recognition that the gnarple has a profound
role in the operation of the human body and a developed appreciation for this role. The way this appreciation is communicated varies wildly. For some, it is included in their daily prayers. Gnarplism is not inconsistent with the beliefs of Christianity. For others, the appreciation isn’t so tangible. One does not “appreciate” the lungs, but at the same time, each person is thankful for their existence. There is an extreme form of Gnarplism, essentially fundamentalism Gnarplism. These fundamentalisms espouse the idea that the gnarples are to be cherished and “shown” the appreciation. That means committing awkward contortions that test the gnarples, then massages that then show the gnarple that person is willing to bear some of the load.

This is a dangerous idea, for it could actually lead to the swelling of the gnarples. While the gnarples naturally change shape and grow from time to time, and size is not entirely indicative of the level of pain inflicted, I have found a correlation. Professional athletes often have massive gnarples for the first years of their career. Then drugs are used to temper some of the pain. This is helpful to some extent because the gnarples are not taxed so greatly.

Problems arise when the drugs are used for extended periods of time Drugs that reduce swelling like Ibuefrofin are fine. Morphine is not. The gnarples lose their ability to properly respond to pain. If the morphine is stopped abruptly, the gnarple can swell up to the size of a tire. The size isn’t visible because of the spongy nature of the gnarple and its ability to exist outside the skin. Cortisone shots are also dangerous because they result in a near complete numbings. Gnarples have been known to die in patients where cortisone was used too often.

A separate form of Gnarplism is the belief that gnarples positively affect decision-making. This is wholly unproven, but certain foods have been shown to improve gnarple efficiency, such as pickles and zuchinni bread. I suspect this has something to do with the chemical changes resulting from the preparation processes. The belief that gnarples improve brain function likely comes from the ability to focus better since the pain is reduced.

A third form of Gnarplism is the belief that gnarples are the existence of God within the body. In this case, some believe that high level of pain are a test by God of ones true faith.

This is obviously just a cursory glance at what Gnarplism is. It has nothing to do with the reality of Gnarpology, but some beliefs are strongly founded in reality. I hope that more information on this subject can be conveyed in the future.

So every now and then I read parts of a book that talks about the speed of light and stuff. It sometimes stimulates my dreaming into thinking of possibilities of what can happen to the universe or blackholes within the universe.

So this topic is mainly about “If the Universe started in a bang, how will it end”

The way I see it is, The universe formed with the big bang throwing everything outwards from the point of origin and that energy is still exhistant and you can prove that by looking at the stars finding one thats a bit red(through a telescope) and look for a white one near it. Now watch the white one for a decade to a century It will begin to turn Red. this of course is caused by light waves and how fast they move and at what frequency Red being the longest and slowest waves Violet being the Shortest and Fastest of the spectrum. You can use this as a measurement of distance a red star would be very distant and would be getting into the group of stars that are furthest from Earth. If a star becomes red it would mean one of two things A. its about to Die B. the distance between Earth and that star is expanding.

This is one of the supporting Factors in The Big Bang Theory that the universe is still growing and expanding over the Trillions of years its been in existence. What if The universe stops expanding through loss of energy granted this wont happen for a long time but if and when the universe stops expanding the gravity of each Mass in outerspace will act more greatly upon each other mass beginning an implosion. Decreasing distances between Planets and solars systems Galaxies coming together and possibly impacting each other something Kind of like the Moon in Zelda: Majoras mask looming on the Horizon except its mars or something. Impacts between planets would in theory crush the core and cause massive earthquakes and eruptions in and of its self causing Nuclear winter.  In order to survive we would have to exploit the shrinking distances and hop from planet to planet Just to survive.

If you ask me the Threat of Global warming pales in comparison to having another planet squash our great great great……………great great Grandchildren.

Hello, after Dwayne’s post I see no need in introducing myself, for he did a fine job. It is indeed true that I Dr. David Scott am one of the pioneering researchers on the Human Gnarples. To help you on your way to understanding the Gnarple I will first talk about What, they are.

A Gnarple is a gland that is surrounded by muscle, it can range from marble size to golf ball size depending on age and race. Every person has two (2) Gnarples, but one is completeley able to live with just one or with Gnarples in absentia.

Where are they located? There is no certain place for a Gnarple or set of Gnarples as they have been known to move. Strange organs they are, depending on what kind of activities one partakes in the Gnarples may be located around the kidneys, inner thigh’s, base of the skull and other loci depending also on Sex and Race.

As far as we know Gnarples are used as pain centralizing organs. The glands are spongy and have a tendency to stay along the nervous system between where injury is caused and the brain. What happens when one gets a small bump is the Gnarple absorbs any harmful pulses from the nervous system and releases enzymes that contract the muscle surrounding the gland causeing shooting pains in a more bearable place in the body. If it werent for Gnarples people would go into shock from the smallest of injuries like a needle prick or bug bite.

In closing I will be opening up my email account to accept questions about Gnarples and what if questions regarding pains. I will post the address soon.

Buying the new GTA4 btw excellent game; blood, guts, sex, seatbelt safety awareness drunk driving awareness. A wholesome game with excellent morals and the sniper guy from Behind enemy lines. Anyways I met this cool guy named Dr. David Scott. I usually don’t like people with two first names (save for Kyle T.) but this Dr. Scott guy seems to be cool so I’m getting Joel to hook him up with his own account for BrownPocket.com hes the foremost expert on Gnarples and has written essays like “Gnarples and you: an essay describing how Gnarples effect everyday life” and his world renowned “O’ Gnarple, Where art thou” a witty accountment of his journey from regular old Neurology Dr. type to Head of Gnarpology (the study of Gnarples) at B.P. international. I hope you all enjoy Dr. David Scott and what knowledge he bestows upon us!

It took a year, but it has finally happened. Barak Obama has become The Black Candidate. It’s not a role he wants, it’s not a role he needs, and it’s certainly a weapon being used against him. The problem of race began to evolve three months ago.

Three months ago, the press and the media started covering the email by someone in Clinton’s staff with the picture of Obama dressed up in Muslim garb. Black Americans are liable to become Muslims is the story that email told. It wasn’t just fear of Muslims that the email played upon, it was fear or Black American Muslims. The Nation of Islam has a powerful and sometimes negative image. Louis Farrakhan, a man who has done good things in the world, has said some blasphemous things that are destructive to politician. Obama started becoming blacker.

Jeremiah Wright made him even blacker. Actually, that’s wrong. Wright said some ignorant stuff, but Pat Robertson and other conservative ministers have said inflammatory things and their candidates still get to be friends with them. The media made Obama blacker by the way they painted Wright comments. Conservative talk show hosts were excited to spread the muck. Liberal talk show hosts were required to do so because they need viewers. No need to be honest, just make the play. Obama had to come out and tell White America how Black America often sees the world. It was a courageous speech. But he was finally speaking for Black America to White America. Before he had just been speaking for America.

Then Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos provided arguably the poorest contribution to the US democratic process of any national news coverage in the last 20 years. In that debate, Hilary Clinton finally got a personal chance to paint Obama, and she did. She brought up Farrakhan. The mention wasn’t useful or constructive. Obama has no ties to Farrakhan. But to a few people, now he does. It’s a question that needs to be answer. No matter what, if someone asks you on national television, “Are you friends with (insert negative image: OJ/Ted Bundy/etc)?” the viewers will think, “I wonder what merited them asking that question. There must be some tie between them.”

Earlier this week, Jeremiah Wright officially made Obama the black candidate. Obama can try to distance himself from Wright’s comments as much as possible, but lots of people have decided not to believe him. And Wright said that he represents the Black Church. He doesn’t. Leaders in the black church have disagreed, but Wright has the podium and his mics are the loudest. “Obama’s pastor represents the Black Church. Obama went to that church because he’s black, because he’s a member of Black America.”

Barak Obama is the Black Candidate now. He’s been painted and forced to become that person. Can the Black Candidate win the Presidency? Clinton wants you to know that he can’t. She also wants you to remember: Barak Obama is black.

*note: I have not decided who I would vote for between the three remaining candidates. I do find the way that this election has evolved issue-wise to be despicable. It’s everyone’s fault.

Really old guy in the office about McCain:

“McCain is too old. I look at him and I can say that ‘man is too old, he should find somewhere to sit down.’ “